
The evolution of life in our small portion of eternity has been a miserable failure! That is my dismal conclusion after reading Ronald Wright’s two recent books, A Short History of Progress and What Is
The first book was originally published in 2004 based on Wright’s CBC Massey Lectures. There Wright repeats the generally accepted theory that all our humanoid upright land animals originated in equatorial
The first book traces the usual theory of the migrations of our early Stone Age forbears from central
In Wright’s discussion of human progress over its countless millennia, the evolutionary theory is simply a given, as it is with me, and his ridicule of religious creationism of one kind or another is stinging. He believes the agricultural revolution caused a more significant leap of change in the human condition than our 18th Century industrial revolution. With that move to farming and settlement our Stone Age nomadic forbears slowly switched from those wandering ways of hunting and gathering in smaller numbers, allowing exhausted environments to renew themselves, to become farmers and multiply, and eventually to urbanise, civilize and destroy the very surroundings that sustained our kind, as well as our co-inhabitants.
Wright’s devastating analysis of the history of European conquest of
Contrary to
One example after another of European cruelty and untrustworthiness in dealings with native groups pervade the first part of What is
Wright goes on to describe many instances of injustice, lies and deceit in America’s dealings with native nations and the land itself as the country’s expansion proceeds ever westward and beyond. Expansion was seen by the soon dominant and generally white new American as his duty, to carry the “white man’s burden” or his “manifest destiny” as one of “God’s chosen people”.
In essence, Wright’s short history reports that
Throughout both “short histories” Wright provides a prodigious amount of energy and astute observations. From them he has gleaned the real impact of the rise of our species and the consequences of the development of our civilizations and the clashes between them on the earth itself and all its organic populations. However, the author is perhaps excessively pessimistic in his outlook for the short term. I see this combined work as a short history of a much longer time. It is a work of history in the tradition of the dystopian novels like 1984 published by George Orwell in 1949; The Children of Men, by mystery writer P. D. James in 1992; Oryx and Crake, by Margaret Atwood in 2003, as well as Wright’s own book of fiction in the same vein. The first “short history” emphasizes human failure to deal with global warming, the second with increasing human populations and their struggles over resources. The religious dimensions and the cruelty, venality and corruption of our kind to each other and the earth as highlighted in these books do not present a pretty picture. Each book closes with a ray of hope indicating that we still have a short window of opportunity to change our ways and preserve our planetary sustenance, restrain our greed and live peaceably together with less. I get the feeling Ronald Wright is sceptical about the prospect that we will grasp the opportunity.
When I consider the generally dismal record of our species, I suspect that we are not alone in writing similar records. Perhaps the seeds of extinction are built into the very process of natural selection from which evolutionary success is derived as
"Judging from the past, we may safely infer that not one living species will transmit its unaltered likeness to a distant futurity. And of the species now living very few will transmit progeny of any kind to a far distant futurity; for the manner in which all organic beings are grouped, show that the greater number of species in each genus, and all the species in many genera, have left no descendants, but have become utterly extinct."Of course he holds forth more hope for the "larger and more dominant groups within each class" but that may just mean that the greater will be their fall.
Bill,
July 23, 2009, 5:45 PM
PS: For those wishing to know more about Ronald Wright, please search Google for a Wikipedia reference or Wright's own website.